Month: October 2020

UK’s Privacy Law Overhaul Could Damage Post-Brexit Economy

By Robert Bateman

The U.K. government is planning a significant overhaul of its privacy laws in a move that experts told Digital Privacy News risked damaging the country’s economy and relations with the European Union.

The government’s national data strategy, published last month, says that the U.K. “will control its own data protection laws and regulations in line with its interests” after the country’s transition out of the EU.

Continue reading “UK’s Privacy Law Overhaul Could Damage Post-Brexit Economy”

Experts Split on Calif.’s Prop 24

By Patrick W. Dunne

California residents will vote Tuesday on a divisive privacy initiative: Prop 24, also known as the California Privacy Rights and Enforcement Act.

Alastair Mactaggart, the San Francisco developer, wrote and financed Prop 24 to enhance or adjust provisions of his previous initiative, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA).

Prop 24 would require businesses to provide customers with an opt-out regarding the collection of their private data and would limit how that information is used and stored.

“Prop 24 aims to give California privacy-first protection like Europe has under the General Data Protection Regulation since 2016,” Mactaggart told Digital Privacy News.

Continue reading “Experts Split on Calif.’s Prop 24”

CEOs Queried Again Amid Rift in Bipartisan Moves to Control Big Tech

By Jackson Chen

Big Tech CEOs again are testifying before Congress — this time on Wednesday — about how they run their companies, but now they are in front of a Republican-led panel of the U.S. Senate.

CEOs from Twitter, Google and Facebook will be questioned by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on the liability shield that companies operate under, as well as its content-moderation practices and effect on consumer privacy.

Specifically, the session will discuss how Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act offers online platforms immunity from the content that’s published by its users and if it has allowed tech giants to enable unintended behavior. 

Continue reading “CEOs Queried Again Amid Rift in Bipartisan Moves to Control Big Tech”

Where the 2020 Presidential Candidates Stand on Privacy

By Rachel Looker

The 2020 presidential election is a week away — and with it comes the chance for each candidate to determine the direction of data-privacy issues for the next four years.

From regulating social media platforms to enacting stronger privacy legislation, either Republican President Donald Trump or former Democratic Vice President Joe Biden may get the chance to shape the future of digital privacy if re-elected or elected to office.

“When we’re sitting here in January 2021, we will continue to see both the new Congress and the next administration discuss data privacy in some way,” Jennifer Huddleston, director of technology and innovation policy at the American Action Forum (AAF), told Digital Privacy News. 

Continue reading “Where the 2020 Presidential Candidates Stand on Privacy”

Q&A: Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss.

Americans Deserve ‘Full Accounting’ From Big Tech CEOs on Their Practices

By Jeff Benson

Nearly two weeks ago, The New York Post published what it deemed a bombshell story allegedly linking Hunter Biden to a Ukrainian-influence campaign on his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden.

Many social media users didn’t hear about it until later.

Twitter blocked the article for purportedly breaching its privacy policies, while Facebook slowed down dissemination so the report could be fact-checked.

The incident put further strain on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives online publishers broad discretion to moderate content submitted by users.

Continue reading “Q&A: Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss.”
Filed under:

Photo Apps Convenient But Rife With Privacy, Security Risks

By Rob Sabo

Photography’s shift from film to digital has brought about an unprecedented explosion of images taken.

In 2000, for instance, Kodak reported that consumers snapped a record 80 billion film photos. But this year, consumers are expected to capture 1.4 trillion digital images via smartphones, webcams, GoPros, drones and DSLR cameras.

Digital now rules the photography realm, but the power of the printed image hasn’t dissipated.

Photo-printing apps — Snapfish and Shutterfly, along with Costco, Walmart, Walgreens and other retailers — allow customers to upload and print digital images from smartphones or other devices.

Continue reading “Photo Apps Convenient But Rife With Privacy, Security Risks”

Daily Digest (10/22)

US Accuses Iran of Sending Intimidating Emails to Democrats as Election Nears; Mozilla Fears ‘Collateral Damage’ From Google Antitrust Battle; House Republicans Press VA for Details on Big Data Breach; Scammers Using Election for Online Profit, Facebook Says; US Citizens Alarmed Over Political Misinformation, Poll Finds. Click “Continue reading” below.

Continue reading “Daily Digest (10/22)”

‘Finally, We Have One’

Experts: Google Lawsuit Shows US Failure to Protect Consumer Privacy

By Jackson Chen

The U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust lawsuit against Google illustrates how federal regulators failed to protect consumer privacy as technology companies exploded to dominate — if not control — nearly every aspect of American life, experts told Digital Privacy News.

“What you’re seeing is the result of years and years of the Federal Trade Commission’s failure to take privacy into consideration,” said Caitriona Fitzgerald of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).

“When you’re looking at a big company like Google or Facebook, so much of the way it is now is because they want so much of that personal data they hold.”

Continue reading “‘Finally, We Have One’”

Your Voter Data Is Not Private — And Almost Anyone Can Get It

By Nora Macaluso

When you register to vote in any election, you may be giving out more information than you think. And, depending on where you live, that data may be readily available to anyone who wants it — no questions asked. 

For his 2012 reelection campaign, Democratic President Barack Obama’s team pioneered the use of big data for political use, amassing a huge database of potential voters to target with ads and get-out-the-vote efforts.

Republicans followed suit — and now both parties have access to troves of data they can manipulate to target specific voter groups. 

Campaigns use big data to “track voter participation and build their parties,” Connie Uthoff, of the George Washington University’s College of Professional Studies, told Digital Privacy News.

The problem is “state law varies about voter information, and states mandate how it can be used,” she said.

Continue reading “Your Voter Data Is Not Private — And Almost Anyone Can Get It”

Want $400 From Facebook?

Tech Giant Reaches Settlement for Breaching Ill. Biometric Privacy Laws

By Patrick W. Dunne

Facebook may owe you as much as $400.

The social media giant recently settled a class-action lawsuit and agreed to pay out $650 million to Illinois residents for violating the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), one of the strictest laws of its kind. 

Known as Patel vs. Facebook, the case initially was brought by a group of plaintiffs in the Northern District of California in San Francisco, alleging the company had violated BIPA, which was enacted in 2008.

In August 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, also in San Francisco, affirmed the district court’s recognition of Facebook’s harm, stating that the company could not violate privacy rights.

The settlement was reached in July.

Continue reading “Want $400 From Facebook?”

Q&A: San Diego State’s Daniel Eaton

‘Work From Home Is Still Work and Subject to Work Rules’

By Victor Bradley

At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in May, Gallup found that 52% of employed U.S. adults worked from home full-time, versus fewer than 6% as recently as 2017.

As such, employers increasingly have turned to technology to monitor and analyze employee behavior. These include AI-capable systems, which they claim to use big data-based insights to identify — even predict — problematic employee behaviors.

But Daniel E. Eaton, a lecturer in employment law and business ethics at San Diego State University’s Fowler College of Business, told Digital Privacy News that federal privacy rights for workers were limited in general, leaving this new frontier essentially unregulated.

Continue reading “Q&A: San Diego State’s Daniel Eaton”